Royal wedding: Your reaction
Prince William is to marry his long term girlfriend Kate Middleton next year. What message would you send to the couple?
William, second in line to the throne, will marry Kate in London next spring or summer and the couple will live in north Wales, where he is serving with the RAF.
Prince William has given his fiancee Kate Middleton his mother's engagement ring.
What is your reaction to news of the royal engagement? What message would you send to the couple? Are you getting married next year? What tips would you offer the couple?
Royal reaction to the engagement
This debate is now closed. Thank you for your comments.
Page 1 of 27
Comment number 1.
At 16th Nov 2010, Smuggy555 wrote:There are more important issues to be debated than a royal wedding.
Like the coalition's destruction of the UK's employment market and welfare state.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 16th Nov 2010, steve wrote:Oh goody rejoice the World is saved.
Hope they have a nice wedding,no doubt we will be picking up the tab!
Any chance of a day off?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 16th Nov 2010, Jack Napier wrote:'Royal wedding: Your reaction'
Woop Woop.
Who's paying.
Brides father is it?
Oh no, thats right its us. Paying a large chunk of the wedding of two millionaires.
If we had a choice I'd tell them to kiss my republican donkey.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 16th Nov 2010, Wee-Scamp wrote:My main concern is whether this will cost the taxpayer anything. Otherwise it is of no interest to me at all.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 16th Nov 2010, Zmank wrote:Good Luck and wish them all the best
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 16th Nov 2010, Sauron the Deciever wrote:Congratulations to the happy couple. I hope that they will be both very happy and enjoy a long and happy marriage.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 16th Nov 2010, aphoristic wrote:Shock horror!!! hold the front page!!! someone is to get married....
Who cares... not me for one. It's a non story.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 16th Nov 2010, SCEPTICAL wrote:Great I wonder what they would like for a present?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 16th Nov 2010, Lord Horror wrote:People actually think that this is news?
What pathetically deferential, sad, servile serfs they are.
Isn't it time we dumped this backward, archaic farce into the dustbin of history where it truly belongs and became a republic like every liberal democracy in the modern world?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 16th Nov 2010, Lynn from Sussex wrote:Unlike his father, Prince William has been able to make his own choice. He appears to be a hard working, caring young man who is an asset to the Monarchy. Congratulations, William and Kate, be happy.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 16th Nov 2010, antipolitics wrote:Good for them :D
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 16th Nov 2010, Ben wrote:I cannot belive that when I select world news this rubbish comes up.
People are at war, starving and dying all over the world and the 主播大秀 put this on the front page.
Why would we want to know about a wedding that we will all have to pay for and for two people who live on a different planet to rest of us.
totally disgusting, what a joke!!!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 16th Nov 2010, goatie wrote:Congratulations to HRH and his fiance!
Errr.....
...about time too?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 16th Nov 2010, rantingPhil wrote:Meh.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 16th Nov 2010, David Hanneman wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 16th Nov 2010, Lucy Clake wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)
Comment number 17.
At 16th Nov 2010, Iamrightyouarewrong wrote:I care more about the Olympics in 2012.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 17)
Comment number 18.
At 16th Nov 2010, mushroomgadgets wrote:Good for them!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 18)
Comment number 19.
At 16th Nov 2010, Martin Swift wrote:I'll have to check my diary...
I don't know if I can make it...
Suppose Tax contributions will go up now...
Ah! well back to the grind...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 19)
Comment number 20.
At 16th Nov 2010, WiseOldBob wrote:Cor blimey: Royal wedding announced and 主播大秀 News goes into snivvelling toady overdrive. I expect there will be endless repetition of the same stock footage of these folk on royal walkabout with comments from a small selection of feckless pundits. Aw: how sweet. Hopefully they won't be needing legal aid in 15 years when they "agree to separate"
I actually heard somebody praising Kate whats-her-name because she "comes from humble stock". So pleased to see we're still living in Tudor Engerland. . .
Complain about this comment (Comment number 20)
Comment number 21.
At 16th Nov 2010, Mike from Brum wrote:Good news, I wish the Prince and his bride the best of luck
Complain about this comment (Comment number 21)
Comment number 22.
At 16th Nov 2010, TheSkyisBlue wrote:Great - yet more expense for the taxpayer!
Does anyone spot a pattern here? 1981 - country in recession and on its knees; let's have a royal wedding to take everyone's minds off it!!
2010 - country in recession and on its knees....only it won't work this time because the vast majority of the public no longer have the affection for the royal family that they once did. More and more they are seen as an expensive irrelevance...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 22)
Comment number 23.
At 16th Nov 2010, Bauer wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 23)
Comment number 24.
At 16th Nov 2010, Rantover wrote:Does anyone really care? I wish them well, but I guess we are now going to be treated to an orgy of speculation up to the date of the wedding itself. Let's face it, they are not goign have to worry about income or where to buy a house. I've got couples who are cancelling their wedding ceremonies because that cannot afford a property, or the wedding that they would like to have, due to recession. And please drop that banner headline off the website - I'm sure there are more important things to report in the world today.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 24)
Comment number 25.
At 16th Nov 2010, swerdna wrote:I say good luck and much happiness to anyone considering marriage.
However, in this instance, no doubt the Red Tops will do their level best to intrude and destroy any chance this couple will have to enjoy their future together. The Red Tops have an unfortunate record in this respect. Shame on the Red Tops and shame on all who read this trash.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 25)
Comment number 26.
At 16th Nov 2010, Bethnal wrote:I just hope that she's not going to aspire to be like his mother! One Diana was enough, thank you, we do not need another! I wish them well, but hope that this one will try and divert the media attention. The only downside is, now all the die-hard Diana fanatics will re-surface again! YAWN!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 26)
Comment number 27.
At 16th Nov 2010, united_kaz wrote:good for him
Complain about this comment (Comment number 27)
Comment number 28.
At 16th Nov 2010, glennptodd wrote:WHO CARES
Complain about this comment (Comment number 28)
Comment number 29.
At 16th Nov 2010, Daniel wrote:OK there's going to be a royal wedding, but it looks like the 主播大秀 News website is going to explode. Why suddenly increase the size of the text? Why not WRITE IT ALL IN CAPS AND REALLY SHOUT ABOUT IT?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 29)
Comment number 30.
At 16th Nov 2010, sensiblegrannie wrote:I wondered if this was about to be announced. I am glad that they have found each other and I hope the press has the decency to allow them to adjust. Don't do a Diana or a Fergie to them please.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 30)
Comment number 31.
At 16th Nov 2010, 24 years and counting wrote:The last thing the general public needs right now is more toffs flaunting their obscene wealth.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 31)
Comment number 32.
At 16th Nov 2010, Wokstation wrote:I wish them luck, but I have as much interest in their PERSONAL life as I do that of a random couple in Skegness - zero. No doubt this news agency and others will, however, spend a lot of time, money and effort going over the details with a fine-tooth-comb in the name of "public interest".
Complain about this comment (Comment number 32)
Comment number 33.
At 16th Nov 2010, Chicharito ate my Burrito wrote:Congratulations to Prince William and Kate, hope all goes well with wedding preparations. Best wishes
Complain about this comment (Comment number 33)
Comment number 34.
At 16th Nov 2010, 3arn0wl wrote:I sincerely wish William and Kate many years of marital happiness.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 34)
Comment number 35.
At 16th Nov 2010, sam wrote:I really don't care, the royal family are a turist attraction and a way for the media to fill space.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 35)
Comment number 36.
At 16th Nov 2010, merseymal wrote:Please do it at a registry office. We can't afford it.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 36)
Comment number 37.
At 16th Nov 2010, Keith Badham wrote:I trust that the wedding will be done on the cheap to reflect the current austerity measures? And that security etc will not have to come out of the public purse....we are, after all "ALL in this together". This is of course all in hope rather than expectation. I genuinely find the concept of Royalty disgraceful in these times.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 37)
Comment number 38.
At 16th Nov 2010, 5XX wrote:Oh no. How much is this fiasco going to cost me now?
The royals family is a waste of money and the last thing we need is more of 'em.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 38)
Comment number 39.
At 16th Nov 2010, Nomasters wrote:Hurrah, pip-pip, bully beef and spam, mind 'ow ye go, very 'umble, sir, yawn.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 39)
Comment number 40.
At 16th Nov 2010, Bmth_newshound wrote:Congratulations to them both. Theres nothing like a royal wedding to raise the nations spirits.
I just hope that the media show Kate a bit more respect than they did Diana. The 主播大秀 should know better than to run articles with headlines "Is Kate the new queen of hearts". Kate is not Diana nor should we expect her to be.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 40)
Comment number 41.
At 16th Nov 2010, mcharding wrote:Absolutely delighted, what a well kept secret, well done William and Kate, (just hope the date of the wedding doesnt clash with either my daughter's or my son's weddings which are also happening next year!)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 41)
Comment number 42.
At 16th Nov 2010, emmalt wrote:Great, a day off!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 42)
Comment number 43.
At 16th Nov 2010, Total Mass Retain wrote:Before anyone else says it, this has been orchestrated by the government to take the minds of the masses off the economic mess. Just as Ted Heath organised the marriage of Princess Anne in 1973 to take minds off the 3 day week, Thatcher organised the marriage of Charles and Di when she was deeply unpopular, this is Cameron's master stroke to make the masses feel happy as they make unpopular decisions.
Conspiracy theorists, did I get that about right? I would argue these are all Tory conspiracies but then the Queen herself got married in the darkest days of Labour's post war austerity.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 43)
Comment number 44.
At 16th Nov 2010, Bart Littlebird wrote:Cue the Royal Family bashing... I wish them all the best although I hope that they are getting married for the right reasons and not because they have been pressured into it.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 44)
Comment number 45.
At 16th Nov 2010, Small acts of defiance wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 45)
Comment number 46.
At 16th Nov 2010, markmyword49 wrote:My reaction. So what!!! A young couple have decided to marry just like thousands of others in the UK every year. I wish them luck. They'll need it.
I just hope that the hype surrounding them is significantly less than that which surrounded his mother and fathers nuptials. However, I expect not. We'll have the usual bunch of commentators trying to have us believe in fairy tales.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 46)
Comment number 47.
At 16th Nov 2010, Ernie Stephenson wrote:I really don't care however I seem to care enough to be able to make this comment...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 47)
Comment number 48.
At 16th Nov 2010, bar958 wrote:Congratulations to both of you. Very well suited, know each other well, and a perfect age.
You'd better not choose the same date as my daughter's wedding next summer. There's no way I'll be able to compete!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 48)
Comment number 49.
At 16th Nov 2010, Sonofcy wrote:How surprising, not. Nothing like a good wedding - or even better war - to keep the plebs distracted. Well it worked in the 80's so why not again?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 49)
Comment number 50.
At 16th Nov 2010, Mitchell Stirling wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 50)
Comment number 51.
At 16th Nov 2010, Biolizard wrote:Congrats to the happy couple.
But, I would like a bank holiday. If my taxes are going to pay for the wedding, at least give me something in return.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 51)
Comment number 52.
At 16th Nov 2010, nomad wrote:Good luck to them, I hope the media and the public at large don't put the same intolerable pressures on Kate that they did on Di.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 52)
Comment number 53.
At 16th Nov 2010, Billy wrote:Unless I'm invited I'm sure it won't affect me.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 53)
Comment number 54.
At 16th Nov 2010, petertpipe wrote:Congratulations, William and Kate,
Complain about this comment (Comment number 54)
Comment number 55.
At 16th Nov 2010, hnb102 wrote:Congratulations to the happy couple. It's nice to hear something positive.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 55)
Comment number 56.
At 16th Nov 2010, Mick Hodd wrote:I wish them good luck and happiness...Marring into his family she will need it.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 56)
Comment number 57.
At 16th Nov 2010, Billy wrote:9. At 11:31am on 16 Nov 2010, ChaosMagick wrote:
People actually think that this is news?
What pathetically deferential, sad, servile serfs they are.
Isn't it time we dumped this backward, archaic farce into the dustbin of history where it truly belongs and became a republic like every liberal democracy in the modern world?
------------
Except Andorra, Belgium, Denmark, Lichtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Spain and Sweden.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 57)
Comment number 58.
At 16th Nov 2010, Johnnybgood wrote:Is mummy paying for this wedding? No, I thought not.
Taxpayers money again.
The country is in a mess and the two clowns in Downing Street are making it worse. So I don`t think this announcement will make people feel any better.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 58)
Comment number 59.
At 16th Nov 2010, shillo wrote:Congratulations both.
I trust the families will be sharing the wedding costs.
Perhaps OK magazine or Hello will help subsidise the wedding.
If you need a Photographer 'Slick' Dave's got one going spare and I'm sure the man who 'won'???? the election for the Tories' Mr Murdoch would be in for the 'exclusive' rights to cover the wedding.
Gran could even make a 'bob' or twon on this.
After all we're all in this together.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 59)
Comment number 60.
At 16th Nov 2010, Len Day wrote:While I wish the couple all the happiness they could wish for, I don't honestly know why this has anything to do with me. It's about time we abolished the monarchy, because it has no place in 21st century Europe.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 60)
Comment number 61.
At 16th Nov 2010, RAClark wrote:And how much is this going to cost us exactly?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 61)
Comment number 62.
At 16th Nov 2010, U14633665 wrote:One thing is for certain, despite all the 鈥淗ow much is it going to cost鈥 comments.
A royal wedding will do much more for the British economy than the current bunch in government
Complain about this comment (Comment number 62)
Comment number 63.
At 16th Nov 2010, darkrenown wrote:Oh good grief, look at all these comments by miserables sods.
It is good news, congratulations to them both, I wsih them all the best.
Yes it is front page news, this is our royal family, and our future king (and queen now).
Complain about this comment (Comment number 63)
Comment number 64.
At 16th Nov 2010, AnneMarieMcG wrote:In my opinion, a 'fairytale wedding' costing the earth (and being paid for by the taxpayer!!) would be obscene when you consider the redundancies and unemployment.
Sorry - the Royals are too costly for the UK to afford!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 64)
Comment number 65.
At 16th Nov 2010, Peter_Sym wrote:Why has the 主播大秀 set up a page for the 'great' British public to pour hate at two people who have really done nothing to offend anyone?
And as to 'what will this cost the taxpayer'... the answer is very little if anything at all. Charles and his sons are supported by revenue from the Duchy of Cornwall, not the civil list. Even if the taxpayer DID pick up the bill it would be a fraction of the cost of the Popes visit and unlike the pope William will eventually be a head of state!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 65)
Comment number 66.
At 16th Nov 2010, Be_Humble wrote:Congratulations to them! I just hope it was not a move orchestrated by the Coalition government to counter balance the doom and gloom about the economy and the anger faced by ten of thousands of people that lost their jobs. The thing that will cheer me up more is for ordinary British families to be able to pay their mortgages and to have a secure employment in this time of uncertainty. I pray this is not a well timed PR exercise :) However once again may I take this opportunity to congratulate them :)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 66)
Comment number 67.
At 16th Nov 2010, Dave Godfrey wrote:If it wasn't for the fact that this will probably cost more in job losses and cuts to public services than already on the cards,I wouldn't otherwise give a stuff.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 67)
Comment number 68.
At 16th Nov 2010, Karl Johnson wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 68)
Comment number 69.
At 16th Nov 2010, The Ghosts of John Galt wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 69)
Comment number 70.
At 16th Nov 2010, Parisian Pen wrote:Can't the happy couple wait a year? Their wedding would make a great opening ceremony for the 2012 Olympics.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 70)
Comment number 71.
At 16th Nov 2010, swerdna wrote:This story certainly seems to have brought the anti monarchists out of the wood work.
The monarchy is part of the unique British culture and heritage.
As for the cost of this institution to the public purse - I think that the earnings that this country via the tourist trade far exceeds to total cost to the tax payer and that is without the work that the monarchy carry out.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 71)
Comment number 72.
At 16th Nov 2010, frankiecrisp wrote:Its been on the news channel non stop since it was announced I'm already sick of hearing about it. the bbc have dragged anyone or even passed her on the street when she was a small child to give an insight into her. Leave the young woman alone. I hope they are very happy but the media will not let that happen will they.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 72)
Comment number 73.
At 16th Nov 2010, Olof Palme in Weimar England wrote:This is news? It'll all eventually end in tears I'm sure. Wonder who the next `Camilla' is. Looking forward to the demise of the monarchy and this endless diversion from real democratic issues at the expense of human dignity, both `ours' and `theirs'. At least on the X-Factor there is some sort of vote!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 73)
Comment number 74.
At 16th Nov 2010, David Hatton wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 74)
Comment number 75.
At 16th Nov 2010, Blackpool Seasider wrote:Sick of hearing of it already.
Didn't they mistime the announcement though - they were supposed to announce it before they announced the compensation being paid to the Guantanimo detainees, not after.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 75)
Comment number 76.
At 16th Nov 2010, Boris Roach wrote:Oh gawd
Another princess for the press to chase all over europe, then splash 'exclusives' all over their front pages
We all know how the last one to suffer that treatment ended.....
Still , takes the pleb's minds off their looming unemployment and rising taxes
Complain about this comment (Comment number 76)
Comment number 77.
At 16th Nov 2010, Bob_ wrote:To all those who complain about the cost:
The monarchy aren't spongers off of the tax payer, they contribute a valuable quantity to the economy and pay tax themselves. Yes, they have an extensive running cost but the income they provide to the public purse well outweighs this. More than 2.9 million people visit the royal properties each year as paying tourists, they do this because of the royal family and without them being an active part of our lives this number would be reduced greatly. If you just look at their expenditure then you are completely ignoring both the direct and indirect income, so Republicanism as a business argument it has no founding.
In addition the monarch has a duty to us, the people and she serves the country for her entire life (even if it is in relative luxury). I don't understand why anyone would want to be a Republic when there are actual cash benefits from remaining a Constitutional Monarchy. Perhaps these people believe the treasures should be sold off to pay for the short term failures of politicians and society? That would be a real achievement, selling off over a thousands years of accumulated history to the highest bidder and not having them be continuously maintained for the nation. All of the Palaces are used by the public to some extent and they are used for the national good far more than for personal benefit.
Most Republicans that I have seen argue on the basis of the fact that they feel they should be entitled to something for nothing not really on the basis that they feel there is no contribution from the Monarchy. Jealousy is no reason to dismiss over a thousand years of history.
Oh, and if you don't appreciate how much of a tourist draw the wedding will be then you clearly have never been to Trooping the Colour or even the changing of the guard at Buckingham Palace! The tourists flock to these events and the royal family are a key part of the British tourist economy!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 77)
Comment number 78.
At 16th Nov 2010, robertcraig wrote:I couldnt care less this will cost tax payers more money
Complain about this comment (Comment number 78)
Comment number 79.
At 16th Nov 2010, mike wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 79)
Comment number 80.
At 16th Nov 2010, Graham wrote:Congratulations to the happy couple. It will brighten up next year and give us something to look forward to. Glamerous bride and handsome bridegroom will mean that this will be the international social occasion of the decade. It will generate millions for the economy and I for one am glad that my tax is paying for something good.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 80)
Comment number 81.
At 16th Nov 2010, Stephen Hughes wrote:Well I wish them luck; I鈥檝e been getting this very strange and uncomfortable eighties dejar vu feeling lately, I think I may be stuck I a closed time like curve.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 81)
Comment number 82.
At 16th Nov 2010, Rosalind Mercer wrote:She must love him loads to want to enter into that ghastly family. Being cynical the timing is a distraction from the more serious events. Only the sycophants will be pleased the rest of us don't care. The Queen should pay for the wedding which in security terms alone will cost a fortune and is not justified during these times of austerity. Rather tactless.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 82)
Comment number 83.
At 16th Nov 2010, W Fletcher wrote:What message would you send to the couple?
And? people get married every day - nothing special.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 83)
Comment number 84.
At 16th Nov 2010, corncobuk wrote:While i`m sure everyone would naturally wish them all the happiness in the world, please 主播大秀 don`t turn into something that resembles certain celebrity magazines. We`ve had some great subject matter in the past where people can debate current affairs, but sadly this isn`t one of them.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 84)
Comment number 85.
At 16th Nov 2010, martin wrote:Its typical of the 主播大秀 to highlight the negative comments, still has its left wing bias
Complain about this comment (Comment number 85)
Comment number 86.
At 16th Nov 2010, Joe Richardson wrote:I am not particularly concerned about the Royal Family in my day to day life but I wish the happy couple well and hope they have a happy future together.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 86)
Comment number 87.
At 16th Nov 2010, Bob_ wrote:@ChaosMagick
Which liberal democracy would you so idolise?
The Socialist chaos that is France? The corrupt broken system that is the USA?
I can't find another country who's political system I admire? The UK isn't perfect but dropping the Monarchy isn't going to change anything.
"Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. When change is absolute there remains no being to improve and no direction is set for possible improvement: and when experience is not retained, as among savages, infancy is perpetual. *Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.*" - George Santayana
The Royal family are our link to the past so that we can move forward.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 87)
Comment number 88.
At 16th Nov 2010, Sauron the Deciever wrote:Its like an Ebenezer Scrooge competition in here today.
"Royal Wedding? More important things to bemoan and gripe about"
"Bah Humbug! Why should anyone else be happy?"
"My taxes this, my taxes that!"
This should be one of those occasions where if you have nothing remotely pleasant or constructive to say then you should refrain from contributing. You鈥檙e just wasting your time...
Not every forum on the 主播大秀's HYS has to be a sounding board for you to blame everyone and everything else in life for your own inability to be remotely pleased for anyone else and to share your self inflicted discontent with the world and your evident failures.
Bloody miseries...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 88)
Comment number 89.
At 16th Nov 2010, jabbajockey wrote:SO--some priviledged toffs are getting hitched, what of it? The days of cow towing to monarchist freeloders is long over. This family hit the self destruct button with it's own immoral and arrogant behaviour in the last 50yrs. How can they be revered or even respected after this--the buble has burst. Jabbajockey
Complain about this comment (Comment number 89)
Comment number 90.
At 16th Nov 2010, Peter_Sym wrote:64. At 11:55am on 16 Nov 2010, AnneMarieMcG wrote:
In my opinion, a 'fairytale wedding' costing the earth (and being paid for by the taxpayer!!) would be obscene when you consider the redundancies and unemployment.
Sorry - the Royals are too costly for the UK to afford
拢37 million a year when we have a benefit bill of 拢160bn? Works out at about 40p each.
In any case Charles and sons are paid for by his Dad's farms not the taxpayer (Charles pays 40% tax on his income so is a MUCH bigger taxpayer than you are). If you don't want to fund William (and I note he doesn't get the option whether or not to rescue you in his 40 year old helicopter) don't buy 'Duchy Original' sausages.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 90)
Comment number 91.
At 16th Nov 2010, Jonathan Fogell wrote:Stand by for huge amounts of pro-royal propaganda. I hope that, during the whole process, the public are aquainted with the actual costs of the occasion including, all security costs. I dream of a time when the valid views of people like me, who think that this will turn into an obscene waste of public resources, are aired alongside the pro-royal comments. Perhaps this would be a good time to put to the public the true cast of the Royal Household and provide a referendum to assess if the British public really want to continue paying it.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 91)
Comment number 92.
At 16th Nov 2010, Lord Horror wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 92)
Comment number 93.
At 16th Nov 2010, steve wrote:Congratulations to the happy couple. I hope that they will be both very happy and enjoy a long and happy marriage.
-------------
Not a lot of chance of that in the Windsors is there?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 93)
Comment number 94.
At 16th Nov 2010, Council_Employee wrote:I wonder who in the public sector would mind losing their jobs to balance the books and pay for this?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 94)
Comment number 95.
At 16th Nov 2010, amp46 wrote:Royal Wedding????
I really have trouble hiding my total indifference with the fact I don't give a Nick Clegg.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 95)
Comment number 96.
At 16th Nov 2010, jeshow wrote:Congratulations to them both. I have a great respect for William. He works very hard and will make a great King and will need a loving wife to support him.
To those who criticise the 主播大秀s coverage: why shouldn't they have this as thier top story? After all, William and Kate will become the future King and Queen of this country whether you like it or not. That's pretty big news.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 96)
Comment number 97.
At 16th Nov 2010, Roger wrote:I wish them both the very best! Good luck to them.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 97)
Comment number 98.
At 16th Nov 2010, Lynn from Sussex wrote:Anyo9ne who thinks we would be better off without the Monarchy should perhaps consider moving to a country that has Presidential or Military rule, Zimbabwe or Burma perhaps.
Our Royal family brings tourism and thus money to the country, the present Queen is the best ambassador this country has ever had or probably will have.
Some of the comments are truly shameful not to mention bitter.
Is it really so hard to be pleased for two people who have obviously thought long and hard about the future.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 98)
Comment number 99.
At 16th Nov 2010, essexash wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 99)
Comment number 100.
At 16th Nov 2010, darkvalleysboy1978 wrote:Seriously?! This deserves the front page of the 主播大秀 news website!?! There are far more serious stories that deserve coverage than a wedding that will cost us miliions.
Hold on...do we get another free bank holiday next year then?? now that IS front page news (seeing as we'll aready get one for the Diamond Jubilee)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 100)
Page 1 of 27