主播大秀

主播大秀.co.uk

Talk about Newsnight

Latest programme

Wednesday, 20 June, 2007

  • Newsnight
  • 20 Jun 07, 05:54 PM

Gordon BrownGordon Brown
One week to go before Gordon Brown takes over at Number 10. Are you excited yet?

Tonight he dons his lounge suit to give his final speech to the City great and good at the Mansion House. Stephanie Flanders will be there to hear what he says.

Equity
She'll also be reporting on the continuing row over the 10% tax break enjoyed by those private equity buccaneers who've made such a splash of late. We first reported that row in February - watch that report here.

But is it really sustainable for a chancellor who has talked about ending poverty to allow the mega rich to benefit from a lower tax rate than their office cleaners?

Lib Dems
Also more confirmation today about the talks between Gordon Brown and the Liberal Democrats. What have they been about? Michael Crick is on the case.

Michael first reported on this story back in May, and he even asked Gordon Brown about it - you can watch his report here.

Europe
And that item on top of the Gordon Brown in-tray - should I, should I not have a referendum on the treaty? David Grossman has the latest on public opinion from Brussels.

Credit Card Fraud
Also, credit card fraud - do the police care any more? The latest 主播大秀 Office rules say the public should not bother the police if their credit card details are used by a fraudster - only banks can report this crime. Is this a green light to more credit card theft? Martin Shankleman has all the details.

Blair
Finally what about the man who is currently in the PM's job? Tony Blair and David Cameron had their usual clash at PMQs today. The next time that happens will be on Tony Blair's last day. Those who've faced Tony Blair across the dispatch box give us an insight into just what a formidable opponent he was and still is.

will be hosting the debate at 10.30. Do join him.

Comments  Post your comment

You ask: "What about Blair?" Well:
Governments always say they have 鈥渓earned lessons鈥 after a terrible event. Tony Blair has been a ten-year terrible event, that of an apparent psychopath in the position of Prime Minister. I am not the first to suggest this of Blair, but last night I was presented, on TV, with a close-up of Blair鈥檚 face as he pronounced himself a 鈥減retty straight kind of guy鈥. 鈥淪traight鈥 we all know, does not pass the test but in that moment he WAS pretty. He had the transfigured, shining quality of Jesus with no hint of Machiavelli or Devil. So: the lesson we must learn 鈥 we voters 鈥 is that charisma can come from a very dark place, no matter how it shines. Always look for the label on the reverse side of your chosen one: WARNING 鈥 CHARISMA DAMAGES HEARTS AND MINDS

The reason the banks/acas are not greatly concerned is because it is not their money that is being lost to credit card fraud - it is ours -the retailers!
If, as has happened on numerous occasions, somebody orders an item from our web-site using a stolen card with a fake address you can guarantee that 3 months later the banks will chargeback the amount lost to our account.
We gave up two years ago reporting stolen cards to the police as no action is ever taken. In one case we actually detained a known card-fraudster but we had to let him go because the police never turned up !!!

  • 3.
  • At 11:06 PM on 20 Jun 2007,
  • toby boon wrote:

First off - why does Newsnight invite us to comment when they fail to give clear link on their website to the piece they are refferring to. This has happened three times to me - the latest incidence is credit carc fraud.

Now to credit card fraud. Why are you having a go at the banks. It is a disgrace that the govt have abandoned the investigation into fraudsters. We have lost 100's of thousands of pound of christmas 2006 through credit card fraud. The police do NOTHING. It is easy and deterent free to steal in Britain today. Just steal card details and buy online. then sell on ebay to get the funds. NO-ONE investivates the theft purchase or the fencing sale. It is a scandal. And the reason they can get away with it? Because it is not the end card holder who pays - they get a chargeback - it is the small-business who has to pay the cardholder back but has had to forego the loss of stock. What really bugs me is the banks now charge a 0.5% surchage on every transaction to cover potential loses on their part so small businesses pay 3 ways running. It is a disgrace.

Well done for highlighting the credit card fraud issue. I have the addresses of a very few regular fraudsters who commit dozens of crimes by using stolen cards. We could catch these people to order and do the public a service. However the Police would do little before this change of policy and now they don't have to. It's not in the banks interests to report the amount of credit card fraud so it just goes on. But this change of policy has made things much worse. A fraudster's charter.

  • 5.
  • At 11:11 PM on 20 Jun 2007,
  • Burbage wrote:

Re: Credit Card Fraud.

In the case of Credit Card fraud specifically, card issuers make 'chargebacks' to (i.e. take money from) the merchants in the case of 'suspect' transactions. So it's not the card issuers, the banks or even the customer that immediately suffers, it's the retailer. It would have been nice to see a retailer's angle on this new approach to crime reduction, and to hear whether they are still allowed to report fraud - though I imagine they rarely want to admit they've been victims, it would perhaps have given a more complete picture of the matter.

  • 6.
  • At 11:15 PM on 20 Jun 2007,
  • margaret rogers wrote:

I listened with interest to your item on Debit and Credit card fraud I have recently been the victim of compromised card fraud to the tune of 拢1300. My debit card is still in my wallet and my pin number in my head. I do not know how the fraud happened. When ringing Lloyds Tsb to report numerous fraudulent items I waas advised it was a waste of time advising the police, they would not be interested. Yet oen of the items was for a Tv Licence, well how easy would that be to trace, and numerous debits to a we clothing company, they have to have some address for delivery

  • 7.
  • At 11:21 PM on 20 Jun 2007,
  • Quis Custodiet Custodes Ipsos wrote:

Fraud BY Banks

I'm not surprised that Credit Card fraud is not being investigated because the banks do a charge back, so the seller of the goods is out of pocket not the banks, this whole scheme is designed to move the loss from the banks, who have the responsibility of ensuring the security of their financial services like for example "Chip and PIN", this is a fraud on the sellers of goods by the banks and the government as neither intend to honour their obligations in helping stop credit card fraud, I know of numerous businesses that have stopped taking credit cards as the risk to them is far to high, perhaps in the years to come with the decline of credit cards and new charges by banks for current accounts that we might end up finding the best place for our money is once again under the mattress.

Brilliant Jeremy tonight (21/10)excellent interview with Michael on GB鈥檚 plans to bring in people outside the Labour party, people like Rabbi Julia Neuberger and Paddy Ashdown and TB becoming the Middle East envoy and also with Stephanie on GB鈥檚 last speech to The Mansion House on the City鈥檚 achievements. Also with Brooks Newmark & Angela Eagle on taxation for private equity firms. Loved the question raised by Jeremy on what would Angela think of people outside the party being put into Labour 鈥 like the Lib Dems! What a surprise 鈥 she didn鈥檛 give any opinion.(Just for a joke, I鈥檇 put Jordan (Katie Price) down as Culture Minister in Newsnight鈥檚 Fantasy Cabinet, as well as Lily Cole (the super model and actress in the upcoming film 鈥淪t. Trinians鈥 as Education Minister . Wonder what would happen if it came true! Ha ha ha) Excellent interview with Sandra Quinn from APACS on credit card fraud. Excellent interview with David Grossman from Brussels. Loved David鈥檚 interview on all the opposition leaders against TB, particularly with Michael Howard.:-)

  • 9.
  • At 11:21 PM on 20 Jun 2007,
  • MF wrote:

I watched your report on card fraud with interest.

I run an internet mail order business and have had direct experience of attempted card fraud against my business.

1. We have identified fraud before delivery and contacted the local police in the expectation that they would a) investigate it and b) take the opportunity to to catch a criminal, red handed. As per your report, the police declined to take action.
2. The APACS representative said that banks have a vested interest in preventing this crime. I believe that the opposite is true, that banks do not want distrust associated with their products and that it is in their interest to keep card fraud out of the news and crime statistics.
3. Fraudulent transactions are charged back to the retailer so it is the retailer, not the bank, who suffers the big loss.

  • 10.
  • At 11:23 PM on 20 Jun 2007,
  • Ken Hawes wrote:

As a shop owner over 5 years ago when we reported to the police that stolen credit cards were trying to be used on goods value around 拢500 and that we could arrange a sting. They said that they were far to busy to bother and that their minimum fraud that they would react to was 拢50,000.
The credit card processing company HSBC were also not interested and said that as long as we had followed procedures then we would be not be liable if we supplied goods to users of stolen credit card.
Is it a wonder that credit card fraud is rampant?

  • 11.
  • At 11:36 PM on 20 Jun 2007,
  • Jackie Domingo wrote:

I opened an account with NatWest in January 2007, in Ammanford, South Wales. I prefer over-the-counter for conducting business, and therefore ignored activating the on-line banking facility. A few weeks later I received an email threatening access to my account unless I did activate the code. I began keying in details, but fortunately it was late at night and I was too lazy to fetch further information to include, and decided to leave it until the next day. By then I was not able to obtain access into that site, and the email was not from NatWest as I discovered after calling into my branch, but who outside of their staff would know I had joined them and not activated my code? I had not even disclosed the opening of the account with anyone, as it was a spur of the moment action when I was in town. An inside job most evident here. Hence, even more reason not to trust business on-line.

  • 12.
  • At 11:41 PM on 20 Jun 2007,
  • wrote:

Ref: Posting No. 2 Toby Boon. I ran a small business 鈥 good luck.
You will have noticed that party politics is 99% a mix of vested interest and 鈥渓ost motion鈥 due to factional manoeuvring. I stood in Newbury in 2005 under the banner 鈥淪poil Party Games鈥 to highlight the crap mentality of the standard-model politician. I have since gone on to propose the following:
CERTIFICATE OF VOTING COMPETENCE. This targets no special group, is open to all to aspire to, (and if we pretend for the moment it will not be subverted by crafty vested interests) should mean that a COMPETENT electorate emerges who cannot be outwitted by devious politicians. The immediate consequence of a competent electorate is that a whole new breed of truly REPRESENTATIVE MPs get elected and an effective parliament accrues. Out go all the lawyers who are amoral by definition, and ambition-led brown-nosers, and in come LOCALLY CHOSEN candidates (not party-selected 鈥渞osette stands鈥) actually motivated by selfless desire to solve problems and help country and citizen. See where we have got to? This new brand of MP would apply themselves to WIDENING the pool Voter Certification (on merit) as this is the decent thing to do; a growing democracy. Of course, the present bunch of charlatans would fight tooth and nail to stop this idea. (Tony鈥檚 鈥渆ducation X 3鈥 is DESIGNED to produce dummies - a magnificent success!) It does not take a genius to define the necessary skills needed to gain a certificate. However, I personally would insist on a psychological awareness test to defeat scam-politics. But it鈥檚 not going to happen in shitty Britain, and an EU, corrupt from day one, is hardly likely to improve matters. Good 鈥榚re innit!

  • 13.
  • At 11:48 PM on 20 Jun 2007,
  • E Ashwell wrote:

Someone used or cloned the debit card from my aunt's room in a nursing home during the last month of her life when she was bedridden. She had never used a cash machine before but 6 withdrawals of the maximum of 拢300 were made. The bank refunded the money and the police said that because the bank were now the victim,since April, they could do nothing unless the bank complained. The bank declined to do so saying it would be too difficult to prosecute. So somewhere in the Midlands a care worker is probably continuing to defraud vunerable old ladies because the system is not interested in trying catching them.
Crime pays.

  • 14.
  • At 11:50 PM on 20 Jun 2007,
  • wrote:

Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad. Those who post on here are ill advised to quote the number of a posting as the Newsnight Gods switch them round! (:o)

  • 15.
  • At 12:09 AM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • The Butterscotch movement??!! wrote:

The Butterscotch movement??!! Brown Liberals...treats people like cr#p until they become happy on it...

"BouRP..Bournemouth Renegade Pigs... Aggravated redistribution of spare credit argument...!!!"

"if they knew him enough to have his card number..."

"then probably they didn't like him cos of what he was like..."

"so he was a bad person who didn't deserve it..."

"and they deserve better than he did...."

"he obviously had too much money..."

"he shouldn't have got it they should"

"he was nicking his job off their people"

"what their people wanted to buy was therefore designed for them and they are supposed to have it and be able to afford it..."

"therefore his people have stopped them getting the money they deserve..so they are redistributing the wealth back to people who should have got it...them..."

"from the bank's point of view it is only money who cares where it comes from it is economically trivial..."

"and bad people deserve bad things..and good people deserve good things..."

"so the money went to the people who needed it and deserved it...using the credit he didn't need...so therefore it doesn't matter he deserved it...and it is a good thing.."

"if he complains like he knows our job better then we should fit him up for something and nick him for aggravating us!!...we know how they feel...his people don't deserve it...they should be taken back down to the bottom of society where they belong...all you need to do is get him in a struggle deteriorate the situation until he exaggerates his importance...they are well behaved and he isn't so he doesn't deserve it like they should have got it... then he should be made to learn who is in charge...and if it is a lucky day we can get him to throw his life away thinking he can tell us what to do and all!!"

BouRP..Bournemouth Renegade Pigs










  • 16.
  • At 12:16 AM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • wrote:

Thanks Newsnight for helping me expose the new reporting rules and letting me take part in the programme. I hope this issue is not left and pressure is put on the home office to change the rules back and let our brilliant police force do the job its paid to do . Catch criminals!
I have a petition to the pm set up if anyone would like to sign which can be found here

  • 17.
  • At 12:18 AM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • mark brown wrote:

i've also this month be a victum of card fraud i'am at lloyds tsb bank and got a call from the bank fraud department about the transaction's 8 from usa stores and 1 from uk. about 拢780.00, in total when i asked where there were being delivered too the said that's date proction act and can not tell me? it my card they are using where is my data protection and should the address be sent to the card holders address only. i'am still wainting to get my money refund to my account. and also my card was in my wallet and pin in my head but they did not use the pin just the 3 diget code on the back of the card...

  • 18.
  • At 12:26 AM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • Mr Wallace wrote:

jeffhall at 2 ended his post with:

"In one case we actually detained a known card-fraudster but we had to let him go because the police never turned up !!!"

I am surprised the dibble(police) did not arrest you later for unlawful detention, if the card fraudster had complained to the police that you manhandled him, they would have soon turned up at your premises, to arrest you.

Sorry to hear the newsnight researcher was a victim of credit card fraud, its not as bad as having your wallet taken by a gun weilding wild eyed mugger, but credit card fraud still feels like a personal attack when it happens to you and leaves you angry, and you feel even more angry when you experience the indifference of the police when you try to report this crime; the police are so 'bombed out' with diversity courses and hunting terrorist they have no time for this kind of crime anymore

I learnt sometime ago, not to bother our busy police with crimes like this, or a house breakin ect, ect, ect, ect, ect, as they are just too stretched. Could not help but laugh when the phone that was brought fraudently, had a delivery address in Liverpool, that would be
about right. Criminality is a normal every day activity for many people these days thanks to the lack of real punishment.

hypothetically speaking here, having the "delivery address" would be my next port of call, and certainly not the police if this was my problem. have car will travel, bring some mates, turn it into a day out, did i mention hypothetically speaking.... i think i did.

  • 19.
  • At 12:52 AM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • wrote:

Re Gordon Brown at the Mansion House: I see he attended once again in a lounge suit. What extremely bad manners and so insulting to his host. What kind of statement do you suppose he thinks he's making?

  • 20.
  • At 06:33 AM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • Chris Belcher wrote:

Sadly the media is again colluding in hiding the biggest lost of democracy to the English people, namely the fact we are being given a Scottish MP to legislate over our affairs. I say this because everyone is reporting Gordon's speech as being about 'British' education. Sorry but he cannot decide about education in Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland, this falls within their Assemblies and Parliament.
Whatever further mess he makes in English schools his constituents will not be concerned or bothered by and so will continue to vote for him. Brilliant, every African president has been looking for a voting coup like that!

  • 21.
  • At 08:31 AM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • Rachel wrote:

I didn't see newsnight, but picked this up on Breakfast this morning. Instead of shouting at the TV as is my normal reaction, I had to post a comment. Why does no one suspect, like I do, that this is a really convenient way to manipulate the crime figures? If they can't be reported, they're not on the statistics.

Will the 主播大秀 be reporting that credit card fraud has fallen significantly when the next crime figures are published? Or will 2 and 2 be finally added together and more pressing questions asked by journalists?

I could not believe that the APACS rep sat there and said that it was pointless reporting all of the crimes as the police were unable to do anything. They can, they can record the fact that it happened!

  • 22.
  • At 08:43 AM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • David Jackson wrote:

My Barclaycard (no security breach at my end) was used for a number of fraudulent transactions totalling around 拢700 last January, including one for delivery of foreign currency to an third-party address in Kent which triggered a security check by the forex company who alerted me to the potential fraud (well done them!).

This 'crime' was reported to the police, who were extremely reluctant to register it as a crime at all, and then took no immediate follow-up action despite having delivery details and other transactions for domestic bills that also should have been traceable.

I therefore suspect that the reported change of policy that was exposed on Newsnight last evening will have little real effect when the 'system' it replaces already seems to have been condoning such thefts.

How the miscreant obtained my card details, address etc was never explained.

  • 23.
  • At 09:44 AM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • stevie wrote:

Thanks for making my day, no matter what else happens today nothing can get to me. Barry Singleton, what a gem he is. I nearly got thrown out of the gym computer room for laughing so much, he is hilarious. What a nation we have become, credit card fraud not even worth reporting, my own city of Liverpool lambasted by one of your corespondents for much of it...totally unfair. I have lived here forever and have never been offered anything 'sus' in all that time. I must get out more. So Gordon wore a lounge suit...does that mean we are bringing the guys back from Iraq next week when the infidel hangs up his gun...dream on. Gordon signed the cheques (a terribly tired cliche but he did) maybe he will move on those office cleaners who pay more tax than the guilty six who keep going on about 'not rocking the boat' they mean their boat. When he puts on his demins I will take notice. Steve Calrow

  • 24.
  • At 10:03 AM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • LW wrote:

CREDIT CARD FRAUD

Last nights report (20/06) regarding credit card fraud made my blood boil.

As I am sure every retailer will tell you the banks don't care about credit card fraud because it is not their money that is been stolen it is the retailers. As a retailer myself, my company makes every security check possible to try to ensure the transactions are legitimate but fraudulent transactions still slip through and once they do the bank makes a charge backs against the retailer. In effect they take all the money directly back from your bank account and also CHARGE YOU 拢15 for the privilege, so they are probably actually making a profit from this crime, IS THAT ILLEGAL?

I am sure that if it was the banks having this money stolen from them they would very quickly put measures in place to stop it.

Once this crime has been committed, whom do we report it to as the police have washed their hands of it? We have the name, delivery address, IPS address of the criminal so you would think that the police would be grateful for the opportunity to make an arrest for this crime!

Maybe the police/government think this is a crime with out a victim so they turn a blind eye. This crime is not victimless, we have had thousands of pounds stolen from us over the years and I am sure that this crime is the tip of the iceberg for the criminals. I am sure that they use this crime to fund other criminal activity and may well be been carried out by organised crime, but who cares right?

  • 25.
  • At 11:26 AM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • Deborah Rice wrote:

I have recently been the victim of internet fraud, the bank actually found it before I did but told me they were waiting for me to report it just in case. The reason it came to light at the bank was because the fraudster could not supply the correct passwords. When I telephoned the bank at 11.00pm on 15th May I was dealt with in a courteous manner but as the weeks progressed I was made to feel like a criminal and not the victim. It took 8 phone calls, 3 letters and a complaint to the ombudsman before I received a replacement card and pin. As of today's date I am still awaiting the return of the money to my account as the bank have decided it was fraud. During one of the phone calls I was told the bank have a 12 day backlog of claims - scarey! The letter received from the ombudsman on Monday 18th June states "we are currently receiving very high volumes of enquiries and we will provide you with a response as soon as we can" this is frightening. Have I been offered compensation, don't be ridiculous and to add insult to injury they charged me for going overdrawn and haven't refunded the charges, now that's what I call hard nosed!!

  • 26.
  • At 11:27 AM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • Alain wrote:

I hope now that Peter was victim of card fraud, he would follow-up the contact about this epidemic of debits/credits cards frauds.
I have hope that something would be done not only with the law, but also with the financial ombudsman which is set to settle disputes between victims and banks but end-up siding with the laters.
I was a victim since last february of a fraudulent transaction through ATMs withdrawals which my bank attributed to me. Since then i ve been fighting against the mighty bank to recover my hard earned money (拢2100)and still the bank is tormenting me. I wonder what the bank would do if anything was to happen to someone in my family because i could not afford to solve the problem while the bank still resist paying me back and the 8% interest that a victim can claim within the county court claim procedure seems to be a joke as i can not see any bank charging any one owing them such a rate at any time.
I urge every victim to fight back till they get their money as i hope i would.

  • 27.
  • At 12:32 PM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • Benjamin wrote:

Credit Card Fraud 鈥 No Longer a Crime

Just wanted to commend the Newsnight team for this excellent piece of investigative journalism last night. I can鈥檛 believe the naivety of Government when it comes to anything to do with IT 鈥 鈥渙ooo cwedit cards wequire us to understand compooters! -we鈥檒l let the banks deal with this on their systems鈥. Have they not seen 鈥渃omputer says no鈥 character on Little Britain? Banks haven鈥檛 got a clue either; I worked at major bank in Canary Wharf in 2004 and they were still using Excel 鈥97! And that was apparently 鈥渦p to date鈥 technology for them! I was a victim of fraud recently (clone of Debit Card used in Pakistan) and I echo the comments made above about how decriminalizing this sort of activity is actually a gift to terrorists and other criminals. The amount taken was only 拢300 odd, but in Pakistan this amount of money could go a long way to feeding, training and clothing a potential suicide bomber.

Trouble is, once the cc crime statistics escalate due to this issue, the govt will use it as another excuse to force ID cards on all law abiding people. Thanks to govt ineptitude, we are all less safe, while the real criminals escape (or are let out early 鈥 but that鈥檚 another story!).

  • 28.
  • At 01:10 PM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • csharpish wrote:

Tony is a good doer who loves headlines and so one could play games with him with questions that have the sense of good doing in them.e.g.

does the PM want everybody in the uk to do only good all the time?

is shouting at someone good?

are wars doing good?

is filling prisons to overcrowding doing good?

....then you can bring in the concept of evil


is dog fouling the pavement evil?

can evil be used in doing good? or should evil never be used for good?

can doing good be evil?

how much evil is there in the uk?

how much evil is there in the world?

is there an end to evil?

etc.

So the only headlines he could make are those that are related to the words good and evil ['PM says Dog Fouling is Evil', PM wants Everyone to be a Good Doer' etc] which exposes that mindset as ludicrous.

  • 29.
  • At 04:20 PM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • martin devenney wrote:

On the 26th May I cancelled a Abbey National card because i discovered that someone had purchased 拢267 of goods over the internet from my account (even donating 拢2 of my money to christian aid!)my card never having left my possession. On the 15th June I went in to the Royal Avenue Branch of Abbey in Belfast to complain that I had never received a new pin number for my new card and was absolutely astounded to be informed by the bank teller that yes my card was stopped alright on the 26th May as stated but somehow someone was still able to access my account and spend 拢1137 on virgin railway train tickets over the internet! The staff in the branch werent interested "oh just ring visa disputes" engaged 3 days solid, the police weren't interested. 26 days later I still haven't got my pin number
dont know what state my account is in
Its back to under the mattress Ps don't tell the burglars!

  • 30.
  • At 05:40 PM on 21 Jun 2007,
  • TonyA wrote:

Credit Card Fraud
Having been recently a victim of credit card fraud I was not suprised by the attitude of the banks and police. The police are gradually moving away from investigating "minor" crime and gradually only investigating crimes where serious violence is involved. More than ten years ago, after having been burgled, the police took the burglar's fingerprints and a blood sample, a witness saw the burglar climbing over my fence, with my video recorder under his arm, and noted his car registration number. I was told by the officer attending that he recognised the number plate, but nothing would be done as there was not enough evidence to obtain a conviction. Had he parked his car on a yellow line the burglar would of course be hounded to the ends of the earth.

  • 31.
  • At 03:45 PM on 24 Jun 2007,
  • G.Barber wrote:

On May 4th during a visit to Sri Lanka I purchased a gift for a friend from an outlet at the International aAirport Katunaiyake.I used my credit card for the purchase.When I checked my account a few days later I found that five amounts amounting to over one thousand pounds had been taken from my bank account using my card details on the same day as my purchase at the airport.The amounts had been used to make payments to T-Mobile UK.I got my credit card immediately stopped and when I returned to the U.K. I contacted my bank as well as T-Mobile.T-Mobile informed me that the amounts had been taken from my account by two persons in London living on the same street within a short distance from each other, that the two persons had made calls to each other and many long distance calls to various places around the Indian Ocean.Knowing the situation in Sri Lanka and the ongoing terror campaign there I suspected a terrorist link and contacted the police who came to visit me a couple of days later to take a statementin which I expressed all my concerns and the ease with which T-Mobile had been able to track the perpetrators of the fraud.I was told that I would be contacted by the police.I heard nothing. After a week I telephoned the police and was told that the case was now in the hands of the Bank and unless the Bank made a charge the police could not take the case further.The Bank has repayed the money to me but I believe that the Sri Lankan connection needed immediate investigation because of possible links to terrorism.

  • 32.
  • At 12:09 PM on 25 Jun 2007,
  • Derek Phibes wrote:

Given that there can be links between credit card fraud and terrorist funding then banks may well hold back significant intelligence information without knowing it.

Even if a legal conviction cannot be brought against the perpetrators due to insufficient information in any single occurence of fraud, the collection and collation of information is important in order to identify perpetrators and their contacts; and I would argue that such collation and identification is the remit of the police and the security services, not the banks.

Politicians, of course, may be able to justify their decision to effectively let the banks withold what may be critical information, though I doubt that; the most likely explanation appears to be the manipulation of crime statistics, which will not be an acceptable justification to most outside Westminster.

Quote and source:
"One of the London bombers, Mohammad Sadique Khan, is believed to have been involved in low-level credit card fraud."

This post is closed to new comments.

The 主播大秀 is not responsible for the content of external internet sites