主播大秀

The 鈥淟鈥� word

• Robert Peston
• 26 Jul 07, 10:00 AM

I鈥檓 signing off this blog for a few days. But with markets rather closer to the precipice than they鈥檝e been for years, the timing of my absence doesn鈥檛 feel ideal.

The threat, of course, is from the 鈥淟鈥� word 鈥� for leverage, you dunderhead.

It鈥檚 about that chain reaction I鈥檝e been writing and broadcasting about for many months now, from losses for lenders at the riskier end of the US housing market, the so-called sub-prime bit, through to the re-pricing of complicated financial products that are linked to this sub-prime market (those blessed CDOs and CLOs and so on), through to the confidence of investors in other borrowers and other kinds of debt.

Right now, there鈥檚 almost a buyers鈥� strike for certain sorts of bond or debt, notably the borrowings of businesses being taken over by private equity.

These takeovers, like KKR鈥檚 purchase of the retailer Boots, have been financed by the big banks in the expectation that they would be able to parcel up the loans and sell them on to other investors.

But as these banks try to sell the debt on to insurers, hedge funds, pension funds or other institutional investors, they鈥檙e being given a giant raspberry.

To be clear, these takeovers still have to happen 鈥� they鈥檝e been underwritten by the banks.

What that means is the banks now have much bigger loan-exposure to private-equity-owned companies than they had expected.

In the case of , for example, some 拢5bn of loans has been left sitting on the books of eight banks, including , , and .

That鈥檚 the so-called senior debt or better quality Boots stuff. The banks are succeeding in placing the more junior Boots debt, but only (and this is important) at a loss to themselves.

The point is that Boots is not an isolated example. There is billions and billions of pounds of other debt held by banks which they want to place and can鈥檛.

What does it all mean?

Well, when a bank is forced to keep a loan on its balance sheet, that is a drain on its capital resources and means it has less ability to lend to other companies or individuals.

And when certain instances of debt are re-priced downwards, well that can have a knock-on to the valuations of all sorts of other debt products, throwing up losses elsewhere in the financial system.

In an extreme case, banks can find their ability to lend on their own account is constrained by a shortage of capital resources. And buyers of debt manufactured by banks can lose all appetite for it because of the losses accrued on the stuff they鈥檝e already bought.

When banks can鈥檛 or won鈥檛 lend and debt-investors can鈥檛 or won鈥檛 buy debt, that鈥檚 a credit crunch, or liquidity crisis, which would have seriously harmful ramifications both for individual financial institutions and for economic activity in general.

We鈥檙e not there, yet 鈥� but the threat of it is keeping financial watchdogs awake at night.

Oh, and one other small thing.

There鈥檚 a sizeable premium in the stock-market stemming from the belief that every company is vulnerable to a private-equity takeover.

Well right now and its peers won鈥檛 get the warmest of welcomes at the big banks if they roll up and say they want to splash out tens of billions of dollars of other people鈥檚 money on buying this or that business.

So I鈥檇 predict we aren鈥檛 going to see any big new private-equity deals for a while, at least until debt markets regain their nerve and poise.

Which means that the share prices of companies thought to be vulnerable to a private-equity takeover are too high 鈥� and that in turn probably means that the stock-market as a whole may be set for some dismal days.

• Permalink
• Comments