Playing happy families in the Kremlin
(This week's newsletter)
Don鈥檛 you love it when politics gets all cosy? Like in Argentina, for example, where President Nestor Kirchner has just handed over the baton (literally) to President Cristina Fern谩ndez de Kirchner. Yes, she鈥檚 his wife. And yes, she was elected.
Or in the US, where President Bush I was followed by President Clinton I, who was followed by President Bush II (son), who may soon be followed by President Clinton II (wife).
My favourite, though, isn鈥檛 exactly 鈥渒eep it in the family鈥, although it鈥檚 not far off. President Putin of Russia said this week that he thinks first deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev would make an excellent President. To which Mr Medvedev replied that he thinks Mr Putin would make an equally excellent Prime Minister. See what I mean by cosy?
But I鈥檓 not sure we should accept these Kremlin games of 鈥渉appy families鈥 at face value. Can you really imagine strongman President Putin suddenly becoming meek and obedient Prime Minister Putin, playing the loyal subordinate to a new President?
No, nor can I. In the bad old days of the Soviet Union, people who studied Kremlin power games were known as Kremlinologists. I think we now need a few Putinologists to guide us through what look likely to be some exceptionally interesting times up to and beyond the Russian presidential election in March.
On the subject of which: why do you think Mr Putin has turned against the British Council? The authorities have ordered all the British Council鈥檚 regional offices to shut down before the end of the year. Officially, it鈥檚 something to do with the council鈥檚 tax status and the fact that it charges Russians for language lessons. But as the Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov openly admitted in a 主播大秀 interview this week, it鈥檚 really the latest move in the ongoing battle over the murder of the former Russian intelligence official Alexander Litvinenko in London a year ago.
President Putin attaches a lot of importance to looking strong. (Remember those photos of him in the summer, bare-chested and virile-looking as he went fishing?) That鈥檚 why he occasionally switches off the gas supplies to uppity neighbours (Belorus and Ukraine). It鈥檚 also why in the summer Russian bombers started flying Cold War-style sorties close to NATO and US areas.
It鈥檚 also, I suspect, why he鈥檚 taking action against the British Council. As I鈥檝e written here before, the Russian bear may have been asleep 鈥 and a bit out of form 鈥 for a few years, but it鈥檚 wide awake now and feeling fighting fit.
We need to keep this in perspective. I don鈥檛 for one moment believe that the Kremlin wants to go to war, of either the hot or cold variety. But it doesn鈥檛 like being taken for granted. So it won鈥檛, for example, sign up to independence for Kosovo, which is a major headache for the US and the EU.
It鈥檚 also making ominous noises about restarting the arms race unless it can do a deal with Washington over the anti-missile defence installations which the US wants to build in Poland and the Czech Republic. And in its current mood, don鈥檛 even think about getting Moscow鈥檚 approval for a new UN sanctions package for Iran. Amazing, isn鈥檛 it, how a few billions from oil and gas sales can do such wonders for your self-confidence.
I remember someone telling me shortly after the end of the Cold War that one of the new realities of the post-Soviet world was that you could get nothing done in the international arena without the approval of Washington. Moscow鈥檚 ambition now, I suspect, is that we should start thinking the same about them.
It鈥檒l be interesting to see how President-to-be Medvedev decides to play his cards.
...interesting, therefore, that "Medvedev" means, literally, "of the bear", or even "son of the bear" if you like...
Complain about this postRussia must intend further EU integration by supporting a liberal president and this is no bad thing in today's political climate.
Complain about this post