This discussion has been closed.
This posting has been hidden during moderation because it broke the in some way.
, in reply to message 1.
Posted by Xavier Banana (U10351839) on Friday, 27th November 2009
Bump
, in reply to message 2.
Posted by Xavier Banana (U10351839) on Monday, 30th November 2009
Still in limbo. Curious.
, in reply to message 3.
Posted by Xavier Banana (U10351839) on Wednesday, 2nd December 2009
Let's limbo some more.
, in reply to message 4.
Posted by Xavier Banana (U10351839) on Saturday, 5th December 2009
Limbo, limbo, limbo
, in reply to message 5.
Posted by Campbell in Farewell Clogs (U14226916) on Saturday, 5th December 2009
I'm pleased to see you enjoying your limbo dancing, but apart from this, what is the point exactly of bumping a non-existent post? I do realise I'm doing the same now, but am still curious as to the possible reasoning behind this. All answers sincerely appreciated.
I noticed that post when it first arrived and the oddest thing was that it was posted by someone in pre-mod so you would think it would have been OK.
As for the bumping - I wondered about some sock-puppetry going on.
Fee
, in reply to message 7.
Posted by Borsetshire Blue (U2260326) on Saturday, 5th December 2009
Sock-puppetry is the last thing I'd have suspected. I thought it was innocent amusement, seeing just how long <> was going to remain displayed in the opening post.
Two weeks so far. Perhaps it's now been lost forever in some sort of black hole caused by the swop from old Host to new? Thus it will never be reviewed by a Host and will be doomed to spend eternity in a state of Limbo.
Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:25 GMT, in reply to Borsetshire Blue in message 8
Poking my head above the parapet here to say that I catpeed it.
There were two threads started, exactly the same and as far as I could see it was spam. I said as such to the mods, and they actually removed one post from the board in its entirety.
So deduce from that what you will
, in reply to message 8.
Posted by Xavier Banana (U10351839) on Tuesday, 8th December 2009
I thought it was innocent amusement, seeing just how long <> was going to remain displayed in the opening post.Â
Yes
, in reply to message 10.
Posted by Borsetshire Blue (U2260326) on Tuesday, 8th December 2009
Thought so Xavier.
I don't think our new host will ever manage to conquer the backlog of posts waiting for <>
, in reply to message 11.
Posted by notjenniferaldrich (U8555450) on Thursday, 10th December 2009
Do any of them ever get restored?
Earlier tonight, I wrote:
"It sounds as if it might have been by me, but I don't remember writing it"
The mods refused to let me post it (that was the whole thing!) because it contained a norty word, so I tried a minor re-phrase and used "recall" or "recollection" instead of "remember" - no luck!
ML competition of the week: What was the norty word in notjen's post??
Answers on a postcard, please - no prizes.
, in reply to message 12.
Posted by lady glen (U10017481) on Thursday, 10th December 2009
It sounds as if it might have been by me, but I don't remember writing it.
, in reply to message 13.
Posted by lady glen (U10017481) on Thursday, 10th December 2009
Obviously not norty any more!!!!
, in reply to message 14.
Posted by Xavier Banana (U10351839) on Sunday, 13th December 2009
Checking
Welcome to the Archers Messageboard.
or  to take part in a discussion.
The message board is currently closed for posting.
This messageboard is now closed.
This messageboard is .
Find out more about this board's
Ö÷²¥´óÐã © 2014 The Ö÷²¥´óÐã is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.