主播大秀

Discussion of the Tory leadership race has shifted from questions of policy to issues of personal morality. Given that most of the candidates have admitted 鈥� to a greater or lesser extent 鈥� snorting, smoking or supping illegal substances at some point in the past, how thunderously should they be condemned? Shouldn鈥檛 people running for high office be blasted for their past 鈥榠ndiscretions鈥�? Isn鈥檛 it right that any person in a position of privilege and authority who has shown a contempt for the law should suffer the consequences? Or should we worry that our 21st century witch-finders have developed an unhealthy obsession with 鈥榦ffence archaeology鈥� 鈥� the diligent digging-up of an historic misdemeanour and using it as a basis upon which to judge a person鈥檚 entire character? It鈥檚 been asserted that even worse than the crime itself is the sin of hypocrisy. An article from 1999 has been republished in which Michael Gove criticised "middle class professionals" who took drugs, at the same time that he himself was taking cocaine. He has defended himself against headlines calling him a hypocrite, saying: 鈥淚f any of us lapse sometimes from standards that we uphold, that is human.鈥� Hypocrisy is an easy accusation to hurl but a tricky sin to understand - La Rochefoucauld famously called it 鈥渁 tribute vice pays to virtue". Our own moral boundaries are so often flexible, yet psychologists suggest we鈥檙e less inclined to give others the ethical wiggle room we might afford ourselves. So should we have more humility to look inward before judging others? Or is it a moral cop-out simply to say, 鈥淟et the person who is without sin cast the first stone鈥�?

Producer: Dan Tierney