Obama takes the oath -- again
I know I promised not to blog again about the inauguration, but this is irresistible. Chief Justice Roberts , in . The White House says they repeated the oath out of "an abundance of caution", even though they believe the first oath, taken on Tuesday, was valid. Apparently, the placing of the word "faithfully" is the issue. I suggested on Tuesday that some may challenge the constitutionality of the oath because of this mix-up of words. Maybe the White House is reading Will & Testament?
Short of a third swearing-in, that really is my last post on this.
Comment number 1.
At 22nd Jan 2009, smasher-lagru wrote:Will - did you post this twice as an attempt at humour, or a genuine mistake?
Two thoughts - his first act as President (Americans always use a capital P for their President) was a proclamation of a Day of Reconciliation (or some hope'n'change thing), so presumably that was invalid.
And then he doesn't use a bible when nobody is looking. Makes you wonder.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 22nd Jan 2009, SheffTim wrote:Past US Presidents Calvin Coolidge and Chester Arthur also repeated their oaths in private because of similar issues.
Theodore (Teddy) Roosevelt also did not use a Bible when taking the oath in 1901. It is not a requirement for the Oath to be considered legal.
Nothing in the US constitution requires that the oath of office be taken on the Bible. Neither do the words `so help me God` appear in the official text for the oath. (The Lincoln Bible Obama used the day before had already been sent back to the museum it is kept in.)
John Quincy Adams swore on a book of law, he was pretty much an atheist. e.g. `This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religions in it.`
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 22nd Jan 2009, DanielSkel wrote:Constitutional scholar Ken Katkin that Condy Rice was acting president for around 90 seconds. I guess if Obama did fluff the oath that means Rice was actually in charge for the best part of the day...a miracle the nukes aren't flying, if that's the case.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 22nd Jan 2009, Orville Eastland wrote:Actually, legally, Obama became President at Noon, even without the oath.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 22nd Jan 2009, jovialPTL wrote:I love constitutional law dabates! Orvill where's your evidence that Obama became president even without the oath?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 22nd Jan 2009, dennisjunior1 wrote:William:
That is excellent news, that Obama re-took the oath again...
~Dennis Junior~
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 23rd Jan 2009, SmasherLagru wrote:Article 2 of the the United States Constitution prescribes that the President must take the oath "before he enter on the Execution of his Office".
And the Chief Justice emphasizes this by usually referring to the existing title of the President-elect. Obama was called "Senator" and Clinton "Governor".
Legally it would seem that while Obama became President at noon, he had no authority until he took the oath.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 24th Jan 2009, Orville Eastland wrote:Well, Bush's term had ended, both by the Constitution and the law, and Congress had certified Obama as his successor. However, you have got me on the oath bit.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)