PMS administration extension is cut to 12 months
A proposed five year extension to running the collapsed Presbyterian Mutual Society in administration was cut today to 12 months, writes Alan Erwin.
Lawyers for the administrator Arthur Boyd amended his plans amid concerns that some elderly savers may not live long enough to enjoy their investments if such a long-term extension was granted. It was also stressed at the High Court that Mr Boyd was anxious to avoid incurring any needless expenses or delays. A judge who agreed to the new proposals was told the administrator still reserved the right to seek a further extension in future if it was believed to be in creditors interests. Nearly 10,000 Presbyterians across Northern Ireland lost access to their savings when the society went into administration more than a year ago following a run on its funds.
More details of today's developments continue below the fold.
The High Court has already ruled that shareholders with less than #20,000 in the PMS cannot receive interim payments from a #20 million pot of assets realised. Mr Justice Deeny's decision last month was taken on the basis that they cannot be classed as creditors. Following his ruling lawyers for administrator Arthur Boyd returned to court to resolve further issues around its future.
Determinations were being sought on how to set off borrowings against what savers had in the PMS, and on the establishment of a committee to represent the interests of those with savings. Mr Boyd had originally applied for permission to continue running its affairs up to 2015 if no buyer can be found. But lawyers for a charitable trust of those who had lent money to the Society strenuously resisted such a lengthy extension.
Mark Horner QC argued that a five-year continuation was inconsistent with the case made out at the beginning. The court also heard that some of those with funds tied up in the society are elderly people who may die without having the opportunity to enjoy the fruits of their savings. It was further contended that the political will to intervene may not arise while the stricken mutual remains in the limbo of administration.
Responding to those submissions, Stephen Shaw QC, for Mr Boyd, told the court his client still considered the five year extension sustainable. "But to justify it in light of the observations yesterday will take both time and money," he accepted.
"The suggestion the administrator now puts forward is that a 12 months period from 16 May 2010 would, we hope, be acceptable both to the Court and to those represented by Mr Horner on the understanding that if within that 12 months period there was a need for an extension, and that may arise, we would come back to court and ask for an extension.
"That period of 12 months might be such that it calms some of the anxieties raised by Mr Horner yesterday. We are anxious not to incur needless expenses and not to incur needless delay."
After being briefed on the developments, Mr Justice Deeny stated: "I think that seems a very sensible proposition. I'm happy to agree to that."
Comment number 1.
At 19th Mar 2010, jboy2244 wrote:I think it is a disgrace that the problem with the PMS has not been sorted out yet by the Government. If the PMS was in the centre of London or even in England it would have been sorted out long ago. I just do not understand why the Government will not treat it like any other Bank in the UK ( I know it is not a bank ) but it has very good assets and I think it would have a bright future for whatever company took it over if the Government would only make a decision and back it.
Come on Gordon Brown make a decision 鈥測ou can if you try鈥 there are many people in hardship because you will not sort this. Because the PMS is in N Ireland and was only for Presbyterian's does not mean you can put the decision off鈥.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 20th Mar 2010, Peter wrote:I just do not understand why the Government will not treat it like any other Bank in the UK
The goverment had no problem bailing out savers with icesave, which wasn't even a UK bank.
The assembly needs to do more in my opinion. Not enough pressure is being put on Gordon Brown.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)