Ö÷²¥´óÐã in the news, Monday
| 09:25 UK time, Monday, 30 October 2006
New York Times: "Critics inside the Ö÷²¥´óÐã’s Web site are condemning plans to advertise on the site, saying the ads could damage the Ö÷²¥´óÐã’s reputation." ()
The Telegraph: "One of the Ö÷²¥´óÐã's most senior executives has defended the corporation against accusations that it is 'crammed full of soft liberals'." ()
The Observer: A diary written by Today programme presenter John Humphrys during his recent period in Iraq. ()
Comments
How convenient it will be when Ö÷²¥´óÐã acquires paid advertising. This way it will have the perfect excuse it needs to justify its bias by insisting it must pander to its audience just like any other commercial station to maintian its audience share. And as a result of this new revenue stream, will license fees be reduced or eliminated altogether? Not on your life, just be grateful if they don't go up to pay for the new department which will administer it (and to add insult to injury, if you ask them why, they'll probably tell you without the advertising revenues, it would have gone up even more.)
"One of the Ö÷²¥´óÐã's most senior executives has defended ...Corporation....crammed full of soft liberals"
He would if he is: not that I think he is, but the defence would be more effective from elsewhere.