主播大秀

主播大秀 BLOGS - Test Match Special
芦 Previous | Main | Next 禄

McCullum performance worth a 'Jesse'

Phil Long | 11:47 UK time, Monday, 3 March 2008

Is it just me or, in the seemingly endless cycle of England Test tours, does the trip to New Zealand slip quietly by every five or so years?

Admittedly it doesn't have the romance of trips to the Asian subcontinent, the hype of an Ashes tour or the swaying palm trees of cricket in the Caribbean but tours to this part of the world tend to be closely fought.

Although it will never match an Ashes tour for many English fans, the New Zealand tour is one that many look forward to with great expectation.

McCullum lit up the domestic final

Since I arrived late last week, two of the players most likely to liven up proceedings in the Test series have had contrasting fortunes to say the least.

Some six years ago England warmed up for the corresponding Test series at the implausibly against an Otago side keen to put one over their international opposition.

A weather-worn local man made sure he told everyone within earshot that the slight 20-year-old opening the batting for the home side had it in him to be 'a bloody world-beater'.

Ever since then I鈥檝e kept a close eye on the rise and rise of Brendon McCullum and, as luck would have it, I had a chance to see the 2008 vintage close up in the State Shield Final in Auckland at the weekend.

The speak for themselves: a majestic 170 off 108 balls, with his ton coming from 52 deliveries (both of which were NZ domestic records) as Otago chased down a seemingly mammoth 310 with eight overs to spare.

It was an awesome display firstly of power hitting followed by controlled aggression that clearly showed the talent that England are well aware of after the ODI series, and which could ignite the Test series given the chance.

While the stock of BMac (a NZ radio jock鈥檚 invention - not mine!) rises to new highs the rise and fall of New Zealand cricket's 鈥渂iggest鈥 newest star couldn't have been more rapid or more publicly played out.

The where and whens of and subsequent hand injury have slowly slipped off the back pages of the New Zealand papers

But now you can't switch on the radio without Iris from Invercargill or Wally from Whangarei letting the wider public know whether Ryder is a 鈥渄runken boof鈥 or 鈥渕isguided genius鈥.

Whatever you're opinion he's just the type of character is desperately looking out for the put people through the turnstiles at Test matches.

Although we'll never know for sure, the NZ papers seem pretty sure that he would have made the starting XI for the first Test.

Ryder's notoriety was confirmed when I overheard two students ready for the start of term at Auckland University deciding on whether the previous evening's drinking exploits had constituted a 鈥淛esse鈥, a 鈥渉alf-Jesse鈥 or a 鈥渜uiet one鈥!

But while Jesse Ryder is inadvertently adding his name to the Kiwi vocabulary, I for one can't wait for the Test series to spark into life in Hamilton on Wednesday.

After missing the last eight England Tests away from home (England's record - drawn two lost six) since their almost two years ago it's time for England to return to winning ways in the land of the long white cloud.

I reckon a repeat of the is on the cards again, or is that just wishful thinking?

Phil Long has been following England around the world for the last decade and has been for the last six years.

颁辞尘尘别苍迟蝉听听Post your comment

  • 1.
  • At 12:28 PM on 03 Mar 2008,
  • BrucieB wrote:

BMac's pretty good, isn't he? But the Test arena's a different story - I suspect he'll only let loose if NZ are either cruising or in deep trouble. If he does, what chance on him bettering Nathan Astle's fastest double ton (also against England)?

  • 2.
  • At 01:28 PM on 03 Mar 2008,
  • Mark wrote:

I went to High School with Brendon and he has been doing this for years. He had so much talent at school that nobody wanted to bowl to him or have him hit catching practice. He has been ear marked for this for as long as I can remember. It's great to see him produce the way we know he can. Fingers crossed he can now do it in the Test Series.
The best pure talent since Martin Crowe.

  • 3.
  • At 01:59 PM on 03 Mar 2008,
  • Ben wrote:

Steady on folks!. The guys only got a test average of 30. In 29 tests he's only hit 2 hundreds!. England have got 2 discarded wicket keepers with better records than that.

  • 4.
  • At 02:16 PM on 03 Mar 2008,
  • Graeme Edgar wrote:

Ben - Sir Frederick of Flintoff also started slowly at test level. Remember that!

  • 5.
  • At 02:38 PM on 03 Mar 2008,
  • Mark wrote:

Yes Ben but he now starting to show his real talent, not just the "potentional" tag anymore. If he plays this way in the Test Series - obviously not at the same pace but with the same intent, he can and will take the game away from England in one session.

  • 6.
  • At 03:53 PM on 03 Mar 2008,
  • Greg Farrell wrote:

New Zealand are a tricky and competitive side in ODIs, however increasingly mince in tests.

This is going to be a one sided morale booster for the England team.

  • 7.
  • At 05:23 PM on 03 Mar 2008,
  • Charlie wrote:

As an aside I see that Alex Gidman played in the Shield final and added to the two list-A trophies he was involved with for Gloucs.

  • 8.
  • At 05:46 PM on 03 Mar 2008,
  • Ben wrote:

Forget the batting, it is the bowling (Vettori aside) that will let NZ down. Minus Bond they have got very little to worry England. Mind you this is England we're talking about - they'll probably have us 50 for 5 by lunch on the first day...

  • 9.
  • At 06:29 PM on 03 Mar 2008,
  • Simon wrote:

Good article, cheers - BMac is indeed a genius ... his dad Stu was a good solid cricketer as well (hopefully he's recovering from ill health - best wishes Stu)

Ben - you seem very confident of an easy stroll in the park for England, granted BMac's test stats aren't too frightening yet - but you must have seen what he did to the English attack in the ODI series ... As for the comments about poor NZ bowling, you underestimate Martin, Mills and Oram at your peril!


If Harmison can bowl consistently down middle and off forcing the bat to play every ball we might have some success. He gives too much away with errant stuff down the leg and past the ears of the Kiwis. Good Luck England !

  • 11.
  • At 09:22 AM on 04 Mar 2008,
  • Dittohead wrote:

To Ben and comment 3 - Yes, 2 hundreds. And an average of 30. The guy bats at 7 or 8 in the test team. Isnt it more to have the top order score the hundreds? For a 7, 30 as an average aint bad. Kelston for life.

  • 12.
  • At 01:23 PM on 04 Mar 2008,
  • Birdie wrote:

England will be lucky to win a toss in this series, let alone a match. The English media has a short memory and if patriotism and bias counted instead of wickets and runs then England may stand a chance.

NZ has a very weak stock to pick from but will still dominate the pathetic England lineup.

My picks for the series...

1. Hoggard will be the best England player.
2. "Bmac" will smash more windows with bat on ball than Jesse Ryder could do with both fists and 12 pints of lager.
3. Out of a possible 15 days of test cricket we will see no more than 11.
4. NZ will win the series 2-1.

This post is closed to new comments.

主播大秀 iD

主播大秀 navigation

主播大秀 漏 2014 The 主播大秀 is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.