Ö÷²¥´óÐã

Ö÷²¥´óÐã Television programmesÌý permalink

Why is Jeremy Clarkson still on television?

Messages: 1 - 50 of 846
  • Message 1.Ìý

    Posted by merlinace (U16177831) on Sunday, 22nd February 2015

    I object to my TV licence money going to Jeremy Clarkson? Yet again he's opened his mouth and been disrespectful to people in this country, that at the end of the day are paying his Ö÷²¥´óÐã wage! He is rude and opinionated. And I want to know why he is still in a job. He's had more second chances than he deserves. If an ordinary person in an ordinary job did half the stuff he's done and said they would be out the door. Please give me an answer why he is still on the television?

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by zelda (U2012536) on Sunday, 22nd February 2015

    I object to my licence fee going on sport, strictly come dancing, the voice, casualty and eastenders..... amongst other things. Life can be very unkind can't it?

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by TomcatRed (U8418886) on Sunday, 22nd February 2015

    Please give me an answer why he is still on the television?Ìý Because, for reasons that I will NEVER understand, millions of people love him (worldwide).

    In fact the more objectionable he gets the more some fools like him.

    Report message3

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by taunted (U16179202) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Are you a Peugeot driver by any chance?

    Report message4

  • Message 5

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by z4mster (U14864348) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I object to my TV licence money going to Jeremy Clarkson? Yet again he's opened his mouth and been disrespectful to people in this country, that at the end of the day are paying his Ö÷²¥´óÐã wage! He is rude and opinionated. And I want to know why he is still in a job. He's had more second chances than he deserves. If an ordinary person in an ordinary job did half the stuff he's done and said they would be out the door. Please give me an answer why he is still on the television?Ìý
    Presumably you had dislike issues with Jeremy Clarkson before last night's programme so, please give me an answer, why did you put yourself through it?

    Was it the drawn on twirly mustaches that pushed you over the edge or are...

    ...dum, dum, dummmmm...

    ...Welsh?

    Report message5

  • Message 6

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by Myshkin (U16115560) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Please give me an answer why he is still on the television?Ìý Because, for reasons that I will NEVER understand, millions of people love him (worldwide).

    In fact the more objectionable he gets the more some fools like him.Ìý
    Yup, sign me in...happy to be a fool. smiley - ok

    Report message6

  • Message 7

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by cricket-Angel Tucker (U3382697) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I object to my TV licence money going to Jeremy Clarkson? Ìý

    Looks like you're a tad uncertain there ...

    But if it helps you any, *my* licence money can go to Jeremy Clarkson and *yours* can go ... somewhere else. Feel better now?

    Report message7

  • Message 8

    , in reply to message 7.

    Posted by technologist (U1259929) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    JC brings in far more money to the Ö÷²¥´óÐã than he is paid, and in any case I think you will find that he is not paid out of LF money ..

    Why people like his antics I don't know but they are many only too prepared around the world to pay for viewing them......

    Report message8

  • Message 9

    , in reply to message 8.

    Posted by Myshkin (U16115560) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    JC brings in far more money to the Ö÷²¥´óÐã than he is paid, and in any case I think you will find that he is not paid out of LF money ..

    Why people like his antics I don't know but they are many only too prepared around the world to pay for viewing them......Ìý
    Not just around the world...I am quite happy to sit in my Surrey home knowing that a tiny % of my license fee is going to Clarkson...smiley - ok

    Report message9

  • Message 10

    , in reply to message 8.

    Posted by tony ingram (U14880461) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I rather like Clarkson. He's always amusing, particularly when he's being totally un-PC.

    Report message10

  • Message 11

    , in reply to message 9.

    Posted by Paul Sherratt (U1632637) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Posh Surrey, Pike ?

    Report message11

  • Message 12

    , in reply to message 11.

    Posted by Arnie S (U2223950) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    And from here in Gloucestershire I'm delighted that some of my licence fee goes to Clarkson.
    There are many other people and shows that I would prefer it was not spent on, for example:
    Eastenders, antique shows, cookery programmes, football, David Dimbleby, Andrew Marr, The Casual Vacancy, Amanda Platell, Baroness Kennedy, anyone from Countryfile - I could go on for days.

    Report message12

  • Message 13

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by angelictennisfan (U8898769) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I object to my TV licence money going to Jeremy Clarkson? Yet again he's opened his mouth and been disrespectful to people in this country, that at the end of the day are paying his Ö÷²¥´óÐã wage! He is rude and opinionated. And I want to know why he is still in a job. He's had more second chances than he deserves. If an ordinary person in an ordinary job did half the stuff he's done and said they would be out the door. Please give me an answer why he is still on the television?Ìý He seems to have a hold over the powers that be at the Ö÷²¥´óÐã and gets away with things others can't.

    I don't like him or Top Gear so don't waste my time watching either. Simples.

    Report message13

  • Message 14

    , in reply to message 11.

    Posted by Myshkin (U16115560) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Posh Surrey, Pike ?Ìý Very.

    Thameside.

    And I earned every penny. smiley - bubbly

    Report message14

  • Message 15

    , in reply to message 13.

    Posted by zen cat chmeifyoucan (U14877400) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Great show last night, and every show I've seen with Jezza has been excellent viewing. He's a great entertainer with an intelligent wit which seems to go over the heads of some people.

    Report message15

  • Message 16

    , in reply to message 13.

    Posted by Myshkin (U16115560) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I object to my TV licence money going to Jeremy Clarkson? Yet again he's opened his mouth and been disrespectful to people in this country, that at the end of the day are paying his Ö÷²¥´óÐã wage! He is rude and opinionated. And I want to know why he is still in a job. He's had more second chances than he deserves. If an ordinary person in an ordinary job did half the stuff he's done and said they would be out the door. Please give me an answer why he is still on the television?Ìý He seems to have a hold over the powers that be at the Ö÷²¥´óÐã and gets away with things others can't.

    I don't like him or Top Gear so don't waste my time watching either. Simples.Ìý
    Which is fair enough...

    What baffles me are those who watch ( and they do, which they betray by their objections to specific parts of specific shows ) in order to whinge and whine...

    smiley - laugh

    Report message16

  • Message 17

    , in reply to message 14.

    Posted by Paul Sherratt (U1632637) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Thameside !

    >>And I earned every penny
    I believe you
    smiley - smiley

    Report message17

  • Message 18

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by olicana_man (U14156932) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I object to my TV licence money going to Jeremy Clarkson? Yet again he's opened his mouth and been disrespectful to people in this country, that at the end of the day are paying his Ö÷²¥´óÐã wage! He is rude and opinionated. And I want to know why he is still in a job. He's had more second chances than he deserves. If an ordinary person in an ordinary job did half the stuff he's done and said they would be out the door. Please give me an answer why he is still on the television?Ìý Hahaha

    Peugeot driver???

    Haven't you anything better to do?

    Mr Clarkson and his pals pay for a lot of rubbish on the Ö÷²¥´óÐã.

    TG is the biggest single revenue generating programme on the Ö÷²¥´óÐã.

    (I ran out of sentences getting longer and longer)

    Report message18

  • Message 19

    , in reply to message 18.

    Posted by briggsy2 (U1288489) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Clarkson is the male equivalent of Katie Hopkins. He just comes out with deliberately provocative comments in order to generate self publicity. His relationship with the Ö÷²¥´óÐã is essentially the same as that of Adolf Hitler & Neville Chamberlain : he knows he can get away with doing pretty much anything as long as TG remains popular and generates money for the organisation.

    Report message19

  • Message 20

    , in reply to message 19.

    Posted by olicana_man (U14156932) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Some people should get a sense of humour.

    Report message20

  • Message 21

    , in reply to message 19.

    Posted by tony ingram (U14880461) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Clarkson is the male equivalent of Katie Hopkins. He just comes out with deliberately provocative comments in order to generate self publicity. His relationship with the Ö÷²¥´óÐã is essentially the same as that of Adolf Hitler & Neville Chamberlain : he knows he can get away with doing pretty much anything as long as TG remains popular and generates money for the organisation.Ìý Hang on...you're saying Adolf Hitler was allowed to get away with conquering a huge chunk of the world because Chamberlain thought it would generate money for the Ö÷²¥´óÐã? That's scandalous! Why was I never told this before!!? smiley - yikes

    Report message21

  • Message 22

    , in reply to message 20.

    Posted by Paul Sherratt (U1632637) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    JC

    "I'm not a racist. I am currently sitting in a bar with a man who lives quite near Wales."


    Ho ho .....ho...ho ho ho ( to be read in the style of Erik from House of Fools )



























    Ho

    Report message22

  • Message 23

    , in reply to message 19.

    Posted by banjax (U14499510) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    crikey o'reilly, I never knew that Katie Hopkins, Adolph Hitler and Neville Chamberlain were in a relationship. POV Messageboard - source of all knowledge!

    Report message23

  • Message 24

    , in reply to message 23.

    Posted by Paul Sherratt (U1632637) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Neville Chamberlain ( on the right ... )



    Not to be confused with the Neville Brothers

    Report message24

  • Message 25

    , in reply to message 23.

    Posted by tony ingram (U14880461) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    crikey o'reilly, I never knew that Katie Hopkins, Adolph Hitler and Neville Chamberlain were in a relationship. POV Messageboard - source of all knowledge!Ìý Should Katie Hopkins be tried for war crimes?
    Or, indeed, just for being Katie Hopkins?

    Report message25

  • Message 26

    , in reply to message 25.

    Posted by Primrose (U16092747) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I'm very happy that some of my licence money pays for Jeremy Clarkson to be on television. I find him amusing, inventive and entertaining and I wish he'd feature in more programmes. smiley - biggrin

    However, I object to any of my money paying for sports programmes, since I find all sport mind numbingly boring. smiley - grr

    Report message26

  • Message 27

    , in reply to message 19.

    Posted by kinaesthete (U14110808) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Clarkson is the male equivalent of Katie Hopkins. He just comes out with deliberately provocative comments in order to generate self publicity. His relationship with the Ö÷²¥´óÐã is essentially the same as that of Adolf Hitler & Neville Chamberlain : he knows he can get away with doing pretty much anything as long as TG remains popular and generates money for the organisation.Ìý I agree with you about his relationship with the bbc, and his self-promoting antics - hardly a novelty in slebs.

    What he has going for him is that many people seem to be entertained by him and some of them also consider him witty and/or intelligent. I don't, he's a dog walking on hind legs, as far as I'm concerned.

    Aren't different opinions wonderful?
    Not really; but they're unavoidable.

    Report message27

  • Message 28

    , in reply to message 27.

    Posted by Myshkin (U16115560) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Clarkson is the male equivalent of Katie Hopkins. He just comes out with deliberately provocative comments in order to generate self publicity. His relationship with the Ö÷²¥´óÐã is essentially the same as that of Adolf Hitler & Neville Chamberlain : he knows he can get away with doing pretty much anything as long as TG remains popular and generates money for the organisation.Ìý I agree with you about his relationship with the bbc, and his self-promoting antics - hardly a novelty in slebs.

    What he has going for him is that many people seem to be entertained by him and some of them also consider him witty and/or intelligent. I don't, he's a dog walking on hind legs, as far as I'm concerned.

    Aren't different opinions wonderful?
    Not really; but they're unavoidable.Ìý
    Damn good of you I say, as one who is entertained by him and considers him witty.

    Report message28

  • Message 29

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by ManicMailman (U14417906) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I don't have a problem with JC per se, my issue is with just how completely uninteresting Top Gear has become.
    Last night's episode spent almost one third of its running time on a piss poor single joke about Peugeot owners.
    Just using the frontispiece of the Peugeot cars, from the 1968 504 to the early 90's 205/405/505, being half decent isn't then an excuse to offer up a film showing JC and JM touring round the countryside being complete idiots.
    Even as a parody it was cringeworthy.
    Thank Christ we can just skip the pointless bits using iPlayer.

    Report message29

  • Message 30

    , in reply to message 29.

    Posted by Myshkin (U16115560) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I don't have a problem with JC per se, my issue is with just how completely uninteresting Top Gear has become.
    Last night's episode spent almost one third of its running time on a piss poor single joke about Peugeot owners.
    Just using the frontispiece of the Peugeot cars, from the 1968 504 to the early 90's 205/405/505, being half decent isn't then an excuse to offer up a film showing JC and JM touring round the countryside being complete idiots.
    Even as a parody it was cringeworthy.
    Thank Christ we can just skip the pointless bits using iPlayer.Ìý
    But you see the bits you found ' cringeworthy .' are the bits that I enjoyed most.

    Johnny Life is a funny old cove.

    Report message30

  • Message 31

    , in reply to message 29.

    Posted by briggsy2 (U1288489) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I much prefer The Classic Car Show on Ch5 to Top Gear. Jodie Kidd is far easier on the eye than either Hammond or May. Last week's show had an interesting feature on the racing circuit at Crystal Palace.

    Report message31

  • Message 32

    , in reply to message 30.

    Posted by Primrose (U16092747) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I don't have a problem with JC per se, my issue is with just how completely uninteresting Top Gear has become.
    Last night's episode spent almost one third of its running time on a piss poor single joke about Peugeot owners.
    Just using the frontispiece of the Peugeot cars, from the 1968 504 to the early 90's 205/405/505, being half decent isn't then an excuse to offer up a film showing JC and JM touring round the countryside being complete idiots.
    Even as a parody it was cringeworthy.
    Thank Christ we can just skip the pointless bits using iPlayer.Ìý

    But you see the bits you found ' cringeworthy .' are the bits that I enjoyed most.

    Ìý

    I thought it was so funny that I'll be watching the repeat at 7.00p.m. tonight on Ö÷²¥´óÐã2. smiley - biggrin

    Report message32

  • Message 33

    , in reply to message 32.

    Posted by wolfie (U15842015) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Agreed ....found the Peugeot thing hilarious...

    I fast forward the car testing...which they seem to be doing more of ...maybe to appease the critics...

    Report message33

  • Message 34

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by pyanaman (U2905997) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I object to my TV licence money going to Jeremy Clarkson?Ìý
    I'll see to it immediately. Yet again he's opened his mouth and been disrespectful to people in this country, that at the end of the day are paying his Ö÷²¥´óÐã wage!Ìý Hmmm, well NO, actually. The programme goes worldwide and makes SQUILLIONS. He is rude and opinionated. And I want to know why he is still in a job.Ìý I refer the honourable member to my previous answer He's had more second chances than he deserves. If an ordinary person in an ordinary job did half the stuff he's done and said they would be out the door. Please give me an answer why he is still on the television?Ìý Done that. Next question?

    Report message34

  • Message 35

    , in reply to message 33.

    Posted by Primrose (U16092747) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Agreed ....found the Peugeot thing hilarious...

    I fast forward the car testing...which they seem to be doing more of ...maybe to appease the critics...Ìý

    You don't like the car testing??? smiley - yikes I think it's really exciting, especially when they have cars like that gobsmacking Ferrari that was featured last night ... and I say this as someone who has never really liked the Ferrari. I'm more of a Lambo girl. smiley - biggrin Or a Veyron for special occasions. smiley - biggrin

    Report message35

  • Message 36

    , in reply to message 32.

    Posted by Myshkin (U16115560) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I don't have a problem with JC per se, my issue is with just how completely uninteresting Top Gear has become.
    Last night's episode spent almost one third of its running time on a piss poor single joke about Peugeot owners.
    Just using the frontispiece of the Peugeot cars, from the 1968 504 to the early 90's 205/405/505, being half decent isn't then an excuse to offer up a film showing JC and JM touring round the countryside being complete idiots.
    Even as a parody it was cringeworthy.
    Thank Christ we can just skip the pointless bits using iPlayer.Ìý

    But you see the bits you found ' cringeworthy .' are the bits that I enjoyed most.

    Ìý

    I thought it was so funny that I'll be watching the repeat at 7.00p.m. tonight on Ö÷²¥´óÐã2. smiley - biggrinÌý
    There is a particular scene where Clarkson is in the foreground having crashed and in the background May starts crashing into a hedge..at which point both Mrs Pike and I cried with laughter. smiley - laugh

    Report message36

  • Message 37

    , in reply to message 26.

    Posted by tony ingram (U14880461) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I'm very happy that some of my licence money pays for Jeremy Clarkson to be on television. I find him amusing, inventive and entertaining and I wish he'd feature in more programmes. smiley - biggrin

    However, I object to any of my money paying for sports programmes, since I find all sport mind numbingly boring. smiley - grrÌý
    I will second all of this. Particularly the last part.

    Report message37

  • Message 38

    , in reply to message 16.

    Posted by TomcatRed (U8418886) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    What baffles me are those who watch ( and they do, which they betray by their objections to specific parts of specific shows ) in order to whinge and whine...Ìý This has been explained many times before but I will repeat it.

    Many people, like me, love cars and there are small parts of Top Gear that are fantastic (test driving a lamborghini in the hills of Italy etc) but there is so much crap (and very little to do with cars) that it is hard NOT to "whinge and whine", actually it is easy not to whinge and whine - don't watch (which is my default setting now).

    Report message38

  • Message 39

    , in reply to message 38.

    Posted by Myshkin (U16115560) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    What baffles me are those who watch ( and they do, which they betray by their objections to specific parts of specific shows ) in order to whinge and whine...Ìý This has been explained many times before but I will repeat it.

    Many people, like me, love cars and there are small parts of Top Gear that are fantastic (test driving a lamborghini in the hills of Italy etc) but there is so much crap (and very little to do with cars) that it is hard NOT to "whinge and whine", actually it is easy not to whinge and whine - don't watch (which is my default setting now).Ìý
    Promise ? Cross your heart and hope to die ? smiley - smileysmiley - ok

    Report message39

  • Message 40

    , in reply to message 39.

    Posted by TomcatRed (U8418886) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    What baffles me are those who watch ( and they do, which they betray by their objections to specific parts of specific shows ) in order to whinge and whine...Ìý This has been explained many times before but I will repeat it.

    Many people, like me, love cars and there are small parts of Top Gear that are fantastic (test driving a lamborghini in the hills of Italy etc) but there is so much crap (and very little to do with cars) that it is hard NOT to "whinge and whine", actually it is easy not to whinge and whine - don't watch (which is my default setting now).Ìý
    Promise ? Cross your heart and hope to die ? smiley - smileysmiley - okÌý
    I haven't watched it for several series now and I never will.

    Report message40

  • Message 41

    , in reply to message 40.

    Posted by TomcatRed (U8418886) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    This is rather smiley - laugh and *SO* spot on.

    Report message41

  • Message 42

    , in reply to message 36.

    Posted by Primrose (U16092747) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I don't have a problem with JC per se, my issue is with just how completely uninteresting Top Gear has become.
    Last night's episode spent almost one third of its running time on a piss poor single joke about Peugeot owners.
    Just using the frontispiece of the Peugeot cars, from the 1968 504 to the early 90's 205/405/505, being half decent isn't then an excuse to offer up a film showing JC and JM touring round the countryside being complete idiots.
    Even as a parody it was cringeworthy.
    Thank Christ we can just skip the pointless bits using iPlayer.Ìý

    But you see the bits you found ' cringeworthy .' are the bits that I enjoyed most.

    Ìý

    I thought it was so funny that I'll be watching the repeat at 7.00p.m. tonight on Ö÷²¥´óÐã2. smiley - biggrinÌý
    There is a particular scene where Clarkson is in the foreground having crashed and in the background May starts crashing into a hedge..at which point both Mrs Pike and I cried with laughter. smiley - laughÌý

    "Bl**dy council never mending the bl**dy roads!" smiley - laugh So, so true! smiley - laugh

    I've just watched it again and laughed even more. The mini roundabout scene was one of the best. smiley - laugh Or the scene with the SatNat and Jeremy driving through the woods! smiley - laugh Also true ... my stupid SatNav took me up what seemed to be a road but turned out to be someone's drive. smiley - laugh

    What a great programme. smiley - ok

    Report message42

  • Message 43

    , in reply to message 42.

    Posted by Myshkin (U16115560) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Maniac !

    Report message43

  • Message 44

    , in reply to message 40.

    Posted by Myshkin (U16115560) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    What baffles me are those who watch ( and they do, which they betray by their objections to specific parts of specific shows ) in order to whinge and whine...Ìý This has been explained many times before but I will repeat it.

    Many people, like me, love cars and there are small parts of Top Gear that are fantastic (test driving a lamborghini in the hills of Italy etc) but there is so much crap (and very little to do with cars) that it is hard NOT to "whinge and whine", actually it is easy not to whinge and whine - don't watch (which is my default setting now).Ìý
    Promise ? Cross your heart and hope to die ? smiley - smileysmiley - okÌý
    I haven't watched it for several series now and I never will.Ìý
    Result ! smiley - ok

    Report message44

  • Message 45

    , in reply to message 43.

    Posted by Primrose (U16092747) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    Maniac !Ìý smiley - laugh

    Report message45

  • Message 46

    , in reply to message 45.

    Posted by hollybeau (U13700692) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I haven't watched the programme for years, it used to be about cars with a bit of fun thrown in, Clarkson was excellent though with his critique.Then it all turned out to be about Clarkson and his cronies and how silly they could take the programme.smiley - shrug

    It suits some but it's lost a lot of viewers, I'm just to old to appreciate schoolboy humour.smiley - winkeye

    Report message46

  • Message 47

    , in reply to message 46.

    Posted by Myshkin (U16115560) ** on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I haven't watched the programme for years, it used to be about cars with a bit of fun thrown in, Clarkson was excellent though with his critique.Then it all turned out to be about Clarkson and his cronies and how silly they could take the programme.smiley - shrug

    It suits some but it's lost a lot of viewers, I'm just to old to appreciate schoolboy humour.smiley - winkeyeÌý
    Actually its gained many millions of viewers.

    Report message47

  • Message 48

    , in reply to message 35.

    Posted by SAB888 (U14777346) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I'm more of a Lambo girl. Ìý
    Great choice!

    Report message48

  • Message 49

    , in reply to message 48.

    Posted by Primrose (U16092747) on Monday, 23rd February 2015

    I'm more of a Lambo girl. Ìý
    Great choice!Ìý
    smiley - biggrin

    If I had the money, I'd buy a yellow one.

    Report message49

  • Message 50

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by Dai Digital (U13628545) ** on Tuesday, 24th February 2015

    I object to my TV licence money going to Jeremy Clarkson?Ìý
    Well do you or don't you?
    I doubt if he actually costs you anything, given the global success of Top Gear.
    he is the best at what he does, and the formula for TG is an almost perfect TV format. In fact, it is probably the Ö÷²¥´óÐã show which ticks all the Ö÷²¥´óÐã boxes most.
    Educate.
    Inform.
    Entertain.
    And it pays. What more could you want? Other than to turn Clarkson into Noel Edmunds.
    You're welcome to your decaff, alcohol and sugar free diet. The world likes its car shows delivered by people who love cars, and speak their minds.
    Witch-hunting is such a dreary spectacle. And far more damaging to the hunters than the prey.

    Report message50

Back to top

About this Board

The Points of View team invite you to discuss Ö÷²¥´óÐã Television programmes.

Add basic or to your posts.

Questions? Check the for answers first!

Go to: Ö÷²¥´óÐã News to discuss topics in the news

Make a complaint? Go to the website.

Ö÷²¥´óÐã News: Off-topic for this board, so contact them directly with your feedback:

or Ìýto take part in a discussion.



Mon-Sat: 0900-2300
Sun: 1000-2300

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

Recent Discussions

Ö÷²¥´óÐã iD

Ö÷²¥´óÐã navigation

Copyright © 2015 Ö÷²¥´óÐã. The Ö÷²¥´óÐã is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.